Technical Review
-
Name Affiliation Christina Rocchi Academic Programs & Policy Specialist, Office of the Provost Michael Vicent Records Degree Audit Analyst, Office of the Registrar Gladys Cabadas Interim Director of Advising Rob Weiher Associate Registrar Heather Wilde Catalog and Scheduling Analyst Andrew Patronik Director of Finance & Business Ops, College of Extended Education Ryan Zamora Student Information Systems Analyst, Office of Admissions Sathyan Sundaram Analyst, Institutional Assessment and Research Janine De Leon Enrollment Reporting Analyst Laura Otero Center for Academic Technologies TBD Articulation Coordinator Christian Flores Records and Registration Analyst, Office of the Registrar The Technical Review Committee is charged with examining academic proposals in order to:
- Ensure that the proposed curriculum adheres to federal, state, system, and campus-based requirements and policies;
- Make a determination as to the feasibility of implementing the proposed curriculum in the various campus systems (e.g., OASIS, Cal State Apply, Smart Planner, Degree Audit, Course Schedule, Catalog, etc.); and to,
- Provide context or feedback with regard to the implementation timeline, based on the requirements and processes of members' respective offices.
Feedback generated by the TRC is submitted in writing to the Associate Provost for Academic Planning & Institutional Effectiveness and to the Associate Provost for Student Success, who lead the Resource Review.
Name Affiliation Dale Grubb AP for Academic Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Michelle Mayo AP for Student Success and Undergraduate Studies Dean Jacqui Grallo Interim Library Dean Cindy Juntunen AP for Research and Graduate Studies Dean Claudia Carter Interim Dean of Extended Education The Resource Review examines academic proposals in order to:
- Ensure resource needs are accurately reflected in the proposal; and,
- Confirm that the University is able to provide resources related to Library, Information Technology, and Advising Services that are sufficient to support a high-quality academic program.
Feedback generated from resource review is submitted in writing to the APs, who collate the technical and resource considerations, and send the feedback to the proposal author, Department Chair, College Curriculum Committee Chair, and College Dean(s).