| |
Depth of understanding
|
Evidence of own voice
|
Significance of the issues
|
Broad contextualization
|
| Exemplary |
Makes direct application of theory to practice; explains theories
in own words, making real life connection; uses analysis and synthesis;
offers unique examples
|
Advocates a position; negotiates between own perspective and those
of others; clearly acknowledges own assumptions, beliefs and values
|
Articulates importance and relevance of action thesis in
a way that resonates with personal passions and experience as well as moral
and broad societal implications for change; challenges what has been taken
for granted or accepted
|
Clearly situates action thesis within different theoretical traditions
and paradigms, and/or political, social, historical, and economic contexts
|
| Satisfactory |
Occasionally offers direct applications and examples; explains,
paraphrases, summarizes theory in own words
|
Identifies and articulates own position; may negotiate between
own perspective and those of others; acknowledges own assumptions, beliefs
and values.
|
Articulates some reasoning for the importance and relevance
of one's topic in a way that reflect both personal experience and broader
societal implications
|
To some extent, situates action thesis within different theoretical
traditions and paradigms and/or political, social, historical, and economic
contexts
|
| Has not yet met the Outcome |
Doesnít explain theories, literature, focus in own words or make
connections to own life and work
|
Rarely speaks from own experience, doesn't acknowledge own assumptions,
beliefs and values
|
Selects a focus without articulating its importance and relevance
|
Does not situate action thesis within a theoretical, social,
or historical context
|